Re: did prolog have any children that lived?
From: Bart Demoen (bmd_at_cs.kuleuven.ac.be)
Date: 03/28/05
- Next message: Bart Demoen: "Re: Thinking Recursion"
- Previous message: tmp123: "Re: Newbie: From Sentences to Grammar"
- In reply to: alex goldman: "did prolog have any children that lived?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 21:17:22 +0200
alex goldman wrote:
> A 10+ year old book I'm reading mentions MU-prolog, NU-prolog and Prolog III
> as more declarative possible successors to Prolog. I wonder what became of
> them?
>
>
AFAIK, MU- and NU-Prolog are no longer maintained (in the sense of
evolving, being extended, enhanced ...).
http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~lee/src/ says (about MU-Prolog): primarily of
historical interest.
Prolog III has a successor: Prolog VI.
In some sense, Erlang is a child of Prolog that still lives (very much).
Maybe Mercury could pass as a Prolog child - but the father of Mercury
might disagree :-)
Cheers
Bart Demoen
- Next message: Bart Demoen: "Re: Thinking Recursion"
- Previous message: tmp123: "Re: Newbie: From Sentences to Grammar"
- In reply to: alex goldman: "did prolog have any children that lived?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|