Re: Prolog newbie question
- From: Duncan Patton <campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:57:48 GMT
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:54:16 +0200
Bart Demoen <bmd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Duncan Patton wrote:
>
> > As I've suggested before, you should avail yourself of the killfile to avoid me.
> >
> > That is, afterall, the tradition hereabouts.
>
> No. The tradition here is to avoid misinformation.
> Don't confuse comp.lang.prolog with other newsgroups.
>
> Cheers
>
> Bart Demoen
I think perhaps you are losing scope here: your arguments, at least
towards myself, tend to resemble retorical reductio, so I guess you
have some classical education. Here's a link you might find more
useful to your purposes than attempting to prove something on me:
http://www.intratext.com/X/ENG0036.htm
Dhu
--
???????????????????????????????????????
Can't get good help?
Contact Fubar the Hack: fubar AT neotext.ca
Area code seven eight zero, Exchange four six six, Local zero one zero nine
Highland terms, Canadian workmanship.
All persons named herein are purely fictional victims
of the Canidian Bagle Breeder's Association.
Save the Bagle!
Sun Ðhu
???????????????????????????????????????
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Prolog newbie question
- From: Bart Demoen
- Re: Prolog newbie question
- References:
- Re: Prolog newbie question
- From: Bart Demoen
- Re: Prolog newbie question
- Prev by Date: Re: question about last call optimization
- Next by Date: win/unix portability (SWI)
- Previous by thread: Re: Prolog newbie question
- Next by thread: Re: Prolog newbie question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|