Re: I now realize WHY my 'consistency check' was pointless: CLP.
- From: A.L. <alewando_won_@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 11:28:12 -0500
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 09:13:44 -0400, "Dirk Mittler"
<mdirk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>I'm still very much a newbie at Prolog, but one of my first experiments was
>to write some code which attempted to find contradictions in the constraints
>or attributes of unbound variables, at a point in time before they could be
>instantiated.
[...]
>
>And to me this generalized test is probably not worth the effort for most
>kinds of programming any more. On the other hand, I also did not put much
>effort into writing it either.
>
Could you please summarize in one SHORT paragraph what is your
point?...
A.L.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ...Contemplating unspecified constraint SOLVERS.
- From: Dirk Mittler
- Re: I now realize WHY my 'consistency check' was pointless: CLP.
- From: Dirk Mittler
- Re: ...Contemplating unspecified constraint SOLVERS.
- Prev by Date: Re: How does ECLiPSe solve reified constraints?
- Next by Date: Re: I now realize WHY my 'consistency check' was pointless: CLP.
- Previous by thread: I now realize WHY my 'consistency check' was pointless: CLP.
- Next by thread: Re: I now realize WHY my 'consistency check' was pointless: CLP.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|