Re: I now realize WHY my 'consistency check' was pointless: CLP.
- From: A.L. <alewando@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 20:53:32 -0500
On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 00:21:39 GMT, student <not@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>Bart Demoen wrote:
>> Duncan Patton wrote:
>>
>>> Again, it seems your english is wanting. Possession and authorship
>>> may be both possessively described as "My".
>>
>>
>> Oh Patton, you are so pathetic, and too eager to point at my wanting
>> english. So eager that you can't even wait until there is a really
>> good opportunity to make me look bad.
>
> No so fast, mate.
>
> It isn't your language skills that are wanting -- far from it.
Could you explain in one short paragraph what is your point?...
A.L.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: I now realize WHY my 'consistency check' was pointless: CLP.
- From: Duncan Patton
- Re: I now realize WHY my 'consistency check' was pointless: CLP.
- References:
- Re: I now realize WHY my 'consistency check' was pointless: CLP.
- From: A . L .
- Re: I now realize WHY my 'consistency check' was pointless: CLP.
- From: Dirk Mittler
- Re: I now realize WHY my 'consistency check' was pointless: CLP.
- From: Bart Demoen
- Re: I now realize WHY my 'consistency check' was pointless: CLP.
- From: Duncan Patton
- Re: I now realize WHY my 'consistency check' was pointless: CLP.
- From: Bart Demoen
- Re: I now realize WHY my 'consistency check' was pointless: CLP.
- From: student
- Re: I now realize WHY my 'consistency check' was pointless: CLP.
- Prev by Date: Re: ...That label/1 predicate's real efficiency?
- Next by Date: Re: ...That label/1 predicate's real efficiency?
- Previous by thread: Re: I now realize WHY my 'consistency check' was pointless: CLP.
- Next by thread: Re: I now realize WHY my 'consistency check' was pointless: CLP.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|