Re: I now realize WHY my 'consistency check' was pointless: CLP.
- From: student <not@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 02:38:20 GMT
student wrote:
Of these two hypotheses, which is least prejudicial?
<DELETE>
That is, which of the two hypotheses requires me to assume more facts that are not in evidence as givens?
</DELETE>
-- logic4sure AT yahoo DOT com .
- References:
- Re: I now realize WHY my 'consistency check' was pointless: CLP.
- From: A . L .
- Re: I now realize WHY my 'consistency check' was pointless: CLP.
- From: Dirk Mittler
- Re: I now realize WHY my 'consistency check' was pointless: CLP.
- From: Bart Demoen
- Re: I now realize WHY my 'consistency check' was pointless: CLP.
- From: Duncan Patton
- Re: I now realize WHY my 'consistency check' was pointless: CLP.
- From: Bart Demoen
- Re: I now realize WHY my 'consistency check' was pointless: CLP.
- From: student
- Re: I now realize WHY my 'consistency check' was pointless: CLP.
- Prev by Date: Re: Help: Multiple Proof Trees
- Next by Date: how to start?
- Previous by thread: Re: I now realize WHY my 'consistency check' was pointless: CLP.
- Next by thread: Re: I now realize WHY my 'consistency check' was pointless: CLP.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|