Re: GNU prolog is not so reliable as SWI-prolog
- From: Richard Hagen <nemo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 02:03:10 +1000
In article <1146364787.460542.10520@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
newser.bbs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
I am
happy
to learn.
This is simply untrue. You are happy to have other people answer basic
questions for you, rather than going to the bother of actually learning
anything, say, from reading and understanding a book, tutorial or
manual.
Please, go and read a book about Prolog (suggestion: use Google to find
one). Also, find out about programming language implementation in
general.
.
- References:
- GNU prolog is not so reliable as SWI-prolog
- From: newser . bbs
- Re: GNU prolog is not so reliable as SWI-prolog
- From: newser . bbs
- Re: GNU prolog is not so reliable as SWI-prolog
- From: Richard Hagen
- Re: GNU prolog is not so reliable as SWI-prolog
- From: newser . bbs
- GNU prolog is not so reliable as SWI-prolog
- Prev by Date: Re: GNU prolog is not so reliable as SWI-prolog
- Next by Date: Re: [Simple] These sources are equivalent?
- Previous by thread: Re: GNU prolog is not so reliable as SWI-prolog
- Next by thread: Re: GNU prolog is not so reliable as SWI-prolog
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|