Re: Bug detected in buggy GNU-Prolog
- From: Duncan Patton <campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 22:39:47 GMT
On Thu, 18 May 2006 22:07:21 +0200
Bart Demoen <bmd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Advait wrote:
Bart Demoen wrote:
It is not a bug, it is a feature :-)
But it seems that this feature may go wrong in database manipulation.
What do you mean ? A concrete example perhaps ?
Cheers
Bart Demoen
It's a feature. He should read the stuff on split predicate clauses.
Dhu
--
???????????????????????????????????????
Open Systems Integration
Contact Fubar the Hack: fubar AT neotext.ca
Area code seven eight zero, Exchange four six six, Local zero one zero nine
Highland terms, Canadian workmanship.
All persons named herein are purely fictional victims
of the Canidian Bagle Breeder's Association.
Save the Bagle!
Sun Dhu
???????????????????????????????????????
.
- References:
- Bug detected in buggy GNU-Prolog
- From: Advait
- Re: Bug detected in buggy GNU-Prolog
- From: Bart Demoen
- Re: Bug detected in buggy GNU-Prolog
- From: Advait
- Re: Bug detected in buggy GNU-Prolog
- From: Bart Demoen
- Bug detected in buggy GNU-Prolog
- Prev by Date: Re: String is not string in SWI-Prolog ?
- Next by Date: Re: String is not string in SWI-Prolog ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Bug detected in buggy GNU-Prolog
- Next by thread: Re: Bug detected in buggy GNU-Prolog
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|