Re: It seems that I found prolog in prolog
- From: Cesar Rabak <csrabak@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 15:22:31 -0300
newser.bbs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx escreveu:
Cesar Rabak wrote:
Did you read what's written in these pages:
> http://www2.info.ucl.ac.be/people/PVR/aquarius.html
http://www.info.ucl.ac.be/people/PVR/user_manual.ps
http://www2.info.ucl.ac.be/people/PVR/Peter.thesis/Peter.thesis.html
Not completely. I'd like to and check the interpreter part of the
source
codes , for the input buffer . Because I want to find the way of
auto-key-in , as I mentioned before.
Well I still do not understand the practical purpose of a such implementation...
It cannot be denied that a Prolog system can built any way, even in assembly language!
I have read the first pages of the thesis and it says that the prolog
was invented before the Warren's abstract machine , and before
BAM . Thus it can't be dennied that prolog can be built without
WAM or BAM .
Everybody, except you it seems, is satisfied with the concept of having a [BW]AM as an execution model.
So I think you'll have to build your system yourself w/o this technology.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: It seems that I found prolog in prolog
- From: newser . bbs
- Re: It seems that I found prolog in prolog
- References:
- It seems that I found prolog in prolog
- From: newser . bbs
- Re: It seems that I found prolog in prolog
- From: Cesar Rabak
- Re: It seems that I found prolog in prolog
- From: newser . bbs
- It seems that I found prolog in prolog
- Prev by Date: Re: It seems that I found prolog in prolog
- Next by Date: Re: It seems that I found prolog in prolog
- Previous by thread: Re: It seems that I found prolog in prolog
- Next by thread: Re: It seems that I found prolog in prolog
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|