I am wondering if there is an accepted (or de facto) standard for prolog
call modes.
I found that +, - and ? modes (input, output and input/output) are cited in
Prolog literature.
Some implementations, such as Ciao Prolog, use a @ mode to designate a
pure-input argument.
I tried to g**gling for "prolog call modes" obtaining just a few results.
Could anybody help me?
Why call modes are not part of Prolog syntax?
I try to implement them using the hook user:term_expansion/2 and it works
well.
Is there something that I simply dont know?
Re: Prolog "standard" operators? ... Or do you want something that can read Prolog... scratch i'd simply use the ISO table. ... >> a compatibility library. ... Zillions of predicates comming from millions of Prolog implementations.... (comp.lang.prolog)
Re: Small, Fast Prolog in Lisp? ... >>of these implementations in Lisp are available. ... > Most of the stand-alone prolog environments seem to be faster than the ... Nowadays full Prolog implementations mostly seem to compile to some ... (comp.lang.lisp)
PROLOG for OS X ...science.... The "programming" section is far from complete. ... specific implementations of PROLOG running with OS X (cocoa, carbon, ... I am also personally interested in Prolog.... (comp.lang.prolog)
Natural Language Processing Techniques in Prolog ... includes implementations of them in prolog. ... This is a problem domain ideally suited to experimenting in prolog.... The link contains good examples of prolog in use (implementing parsers) ... (for minimally experienced prologgers like myself - and others might find them useful too). ... (comp.lang.prolog)
Re: PSP ... > the Prolog interpreter starts up, then it loads up the Prolog program,...Ciao Prolog includes libraries that implement Active Modules.... (comp.lang.prolog)
