Re: ASSERT in SWI Prolog
- From: A.L. <alewando@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 06:25:56 -0500
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 01:43:59 +0000 (UTC), russell kym horsell
<kym@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But Prolog is not a declarative language. It is a *programming* language.
Order of conjuncts generally matters, despite some work in the past 30 years to
make it not matter so much. The order of clauses matters.
And the order of related facts matters.
The termination of almost all extant programs (considering most were not
written in the past 5 years) depends on such things.
What programs?..
Removing the dependence on order has the obvious information-theoretic
implication.
Specifically?...
A.L.
.
- References:
- ASSERT in SWI Prolog
- From: Mika
- Re: ASSERT in SWI Prolog
- From: Advait
- Re: ASSERT in SWI Prolog
- From: russell kym horsell
- Re: ASSERT in SWI Prolog
- From: A . L .
- Re: ASSERT in SWI Prolog
- From: russell kym horsell
- Re: ASSERT in SWI Prolog
- From: A . L .
- Re: ASSERT in SWI Prolog
- From: russell kym horsell
- ASSERT in SWI Prolog
- Prev by Date: Re: ASSERT in SWI Prolog
- Next by Date: Re: C/C++ written tiny prolog
- Previous by thread: Re: ASSERT in SWI Prolog
- Next by thread: Re: ASSERT in SWI Prolog
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|