Re: Logtalk vs XPCE?


MaR wrote:
A somewhat newbie question:

I need OO support in a system to be created.
Logtalk gives good readability and interesting features (object,
protocol, category, syntax).
XPCE, I see as more a graphics library support thingy.. (Am I mistaken
here?)

Since I'd like to use XPCE for UI and Logtalk for modelling, I'd like
to know if there are any issues combining them?

Me and Jan have received reports in the past of some users doing just
that. I would not expect any roadblocks. Btw, the latest Logtalk
release (2.28.1) includes improved integration with SWI-Prolog (namely,
support for the edit/1 and make/0 development predicates when doing
Logtalk programming).

Cheers,

Paulo

.

Relevant Pages

  • Logtalk 2.26.0 released
    ... Logtalk 2.26.0 is now available for downloading from the Logtalk web ... This release major highlights are support for defining predicate ... using Prolog modules as Logtalk objects (complemented by a new Prolog ... The new support for compiling Prolog ...
    (comp.lang.prolog)
  • Re: Logtalk vs XPCE?
    ... Logtalk gives good readability and interesting features (object, ... XPCE, I see as more a graphics library support thingy.. ... Calling XPCE methods defined in Prolog is relatively ...
    (comp.lang.prolog)
  • Logtalk 2.27.0 released
    ... Logtalk 2.27.0 is now available for downloading from the Logtalk web ... This release features improved support for grammar rules with a new ... grammar rule translator, ...
    (comp.lang.prolog)
  • Logtalk vs XPCE?
    ... protocol, category, syntax). ... XPCE, I see as more a graphics library support thingy.. ... Since I'd like to use XPCE for UI and Logtalk for modelling, ...
    (comp.lang.prolog)
  • Re: Logtalk vs XPCE?
    ... It should be doable as Logtalk supports all all the OOP concepts ... Creating the wrappers automatically will be the ... with XPCE changes. ... Right now, with all my teaching duties, Logtalk ...
    (comp.lang.prolog)