Re: Prolog module system
- From: Paulo Moura <pjlmoura@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 08:18:12 -0000
On Jun 16, 1:46 am, Cesar Rabak <csra...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Joachim Schimpf escreveu:
[snipped]
OO systems have much more complex built-in lookup rules. One could be
bold and say that they effectively hide some module arguments and
module qualifications. That doesn't necessarily mean it's a bad idea,
but one has to ask whether the increase in language complexity is
justified by reduced application complexity.
Would you be surprised if the answer were *yes*?
Ditto. This Wikipedia entry comes to mind:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worse_is_Better
All the best,
Paulo
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Prolog module system
- From: Cesar Rabak
- Re: Prolog module system
- References:
- Re: Prolog module system
- From: Paulo Moura
- Re: Prolog module system
- From: bart demoen
- Re: Prolog module system
- From: Paulo Moura
- Re: Prolog module system
- From: bart demoen
- Re: Prolog module system
- From: Paulo Moura
- Re: Prolog module system
- From: bart demoen
- Re: Prolog module system
- From: Paulo Moura
- Re: Prolog module system
- From: bart demoen
- Re: Prolog module system
- From: Paulo Moura
- Re: Prolog module system
- From: A . L .
- Re: Prolog module system
- From: Paulo Moura
- Re: Prolog module system
- From: Jan Wielemaker
- Re: Prolog module system
- From: Paulo Moura
- Re: Prolog module system
- From: Joachim Schimpf
- Re: Prolog module system
- From: Paulo Moura
- Re: Prolog module system
- From: Jan Wielemaker
- Re: Prolog module system
- From: Joachim Schimpf
- Re: Prolog module system
- From: Cesar Rabak
- Re: Prolog module system
- Prev by Date: Re: Prolog module system
- Next by Date: Re: Prolog module system
- Previous by thread: Re: Prolog module system
- Next by thread: Re: Prolog module system
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|