Re: Prolog vs FP
- From: Duncan Patton <campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 21:43:56 GMT
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 20:08:15 -0500
A.L. <fela@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:45:01 GMT, Duncan Patton <campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 07:09:35 -0500
A.L. <fela@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 22:38:59 -0700, drop669@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi.
In our days, is there any good reason to learn and use Prolog or it
may be useful just to switch to some modern FP language like Haskell?
Depends for what. If you want to train your brain, learn both. If you
think about job market - I know that Prolog is used here and there,
but finding a job that requires Haskell is like winning a lottery.
See the following
http://cufp.galois.com/CUFP-2005-Notes.pdf
http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/wadler/realworld/
but also see this
http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/wadler/papers/how-and-why/how-and-why.pdf
A.L.
P.S. If you want to train your brain, learn also Scheme
I thot that was "Perl" ;-)
And I was thinking that you pretend stupid. I was wrong...
A.L.
Whatever else you might think, I make no pretense.
Dhu
.
- References:
- Prolog vs FP
- From: drop669
- Re: Prolog vs FP
- From: A . L .
- Re: Prolog vs FP
- From: Duncan Patton
- Re: Prolog vs FP
- From: A . L .
- Prolog vs FP
- Prev by Date: Re: Prolog vs FP
- Next by Date: syntax check
- Previous by thread: Re: Prolog vs FP
- Next by thread: Heuristic backtrack in Prolog?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|