Re: CLP(FD): what is necessary?
- From: A.L. <alewando@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:55:30 -0500
On 13 Mar 2008 13:23:32 GMT, Jan Wielemaker <jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On 2008-03-13, Wit Jakuczun <wit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
I am transferring a private discussion with Markus Triska
about clpfd library that is a part of SWI Prolog.
Markus asked me (after tracking my discussion on
polish newsgroup with AL) what is wrong with his clp library.
I will be talking only about ECLiPSe and SWI because
this two prologs are only that could be considered
as free.
<snip>
Thanks for your input. I'd like to concentrate on this:
My opinion is that free prologs could be used for
proprietary software but their creators should
pay more attention to what is important to business
and business needs "just-enough" solutions and
not "do-everything" solutions.
I think the discussion is about `free'.
I see this discussion (at least, as it started on pl.comp.lang.c) a
bit differently: what is needed to have complete CLP(FD) system that
could be useb not only for solving MONEY and Sudoku problems, but
problems of industrial complexity ans scale.
One requirement, posted on that discssion was that there must be
framework for creating new global constraints. And this is what I
don't see in SWI CLP(FD) library. Or it is there, but I don't see
this?...
A.L.
.
- References:
- CLP(FD): what is necessary?
- From: Wit Jakuczun
- Re: CLP(FD): what is necessary?
- From: Jan Wielemaker
- CLP(FD): what is necessary?
- Prev by Date: Re: CLP(FD): what is necessary?
- Next by Date: Re: CLP(FD): what is necessary?
- Previous by thread: Re: CLP(FD): what is necessary?
- Next by thread: Re: CLP(FD): what is necessary?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
