Re: large databases
- From: Cameron Hughes <cahughes@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 08:35:26 -0400
Jan Wielemaker wrote:
On 2008-05-23, Simon Strobl <Simon.Strobl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
SWI should load this *much* faster, so something is wrong.
Oddly enough, I cannot reproduce the problem with Swi. It is working
now. Maybe my screen session crashed or there was a server problem.
Thanks for your tips, anyway.
Here is part of my Swi session:
Welcome to SWI-Prolog (Multi-threaded, 64 bits, Version 5.6.55)
Copyright (c) 1990-2008 University of Amsterdam.
SWI-Prolog comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software,
and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions.
Please visit http://www.swi-prolog.org for details.
For help, use ?- help(Topic). or ?- apropos(Word).
?- consult(data).
% data compiled 6743.67 sec, 11,872,550,352 bytes
true.
Next time, try
?- qcompile(data).
That will load data and produce the file date.qlf. The next
?- [data].
will load data.qlf, which loads roughly 10 times faster (depending on
the structure of the data, whether loading is CPU bound or I/O bound,
etc.).
Enjoy --- Jan
SWI-Prolog continues to be one of the most well rounded Prologs out
there! Jan
your always willingness to help, give advice, and support is very much
appreciated.
I hope this community realizes what a valuable resource you are!!!!
In case you haven't heard it recently, thanx for the committment and
all your contribution
to the Prolog community.
Cameron
.
- References:
- large databases
- From: Simon Strobl
- Re: large databases
- From: Jan Wielemaker
- Re: large databases
- From: Simon Strobl
- Re: large databases
- From: Jan Wielemaker
- Re: large databases
- From: Simon Strobl
- Re: large databases
- From: Jan Wielemaker
- large databases
- Prev by Date: Re: JPL integratione error
- Next by Date: Re: JPL integratione error
- Previous by thread: Re: large databases
- Next by thread: call, ..= operator, records (newbie)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|