Re: CLP(FD) team for the ASP solver competition
- From: Bart Demoen <bmd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:35:54 +0000 (UTC)
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:03:06 +0000, Ulrich Neumerkel wrote:
Of course. My point is just that even here must_be/2 helps to clarify
some cases that wouldn'nt be that clear and efficient without it.
"clear" ok - "efficient" ... you have mentioned that a couple of times
already, and I do not see how must_be/2 is good for efficiency (you mean
run-time efficiency, no ?)
Another thing about must_be/2 : I think that a library that possibly
throws exceptions - and using must_be/2 does that - should also catch
those exceptions.
Cheers
Bart Demoen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CLP(FD) team for the ASP solver competition
- From: Ulrich Neumerkel
- Re: CLP(FD) team for the ASP solver competition
- References:
- CLP(FD) team for the ASP solver competition
- From: neng . zhou
- Re: CLP(FD) team for the ASP solver competition
- From: LudovicoVan
- Re: CLP(FD) team for the ASP solver competition
- From: Markus Triska
- Re: CLP(FD) team for the ASP solver competition
- From: LudovicoVan
- Re: CLP(FD) team for the ASP solver competition
- From: Markus Triska
- Re: CLP(FD) team for the ASP solver competition
- From: bart demoen
- Re: CLP(FD) team for the ASP solver competition
- From: Ulrich Neumerkel
- Re: CLP(FD) team for the ASP solver competition
- From: Bart Demoen
- Re: CLP(FD) team for the ASP solver competition
- From: Ulrich Neumerkel
- Re: CLP(FD) team for the ASP solver competition
- From: bart demoen
- Re: CLP(FD) team for the ASP solver competition
- From: Ulrich Neumerkel
- CLP(FD) team for the ASP solver competition
- Prev by Date: Re: CLP(FD) team for the ASP solver competition
- Next by Date: Re: CLP(FD) team for the ASP solver competition
- Previous by thread: Re: CLP(FD) team for the ASP solver competition
- Next by thread: Re: CLP(FD) team for the ASP solver competition
- Index(es):