Re: itertools.flatten()? and copying generators/iterators.
From: Francis Avila (francisgavila_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 10/30/03
- Next message: Stephen J. Bevan: "Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint"
- Previous message: Joachim Durchholz: "Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint"
- In reply to: Francis Avila: "Re: itertools.flatten()? and copying generators/iterators."
- Next in thread: Peter Otten: "Re: itertools.flatten()? and copying generators/iterators."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 21:41:38 -0500
"Francis Avila" <francisgavila@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vq0rg4l1uasj31@corp.supernews.com...
> As expected, given the same test tree (which doesn't exercise itercond),
the
> speed is about the same.
*Ahem*:
> def flatten_fastcond(s, isScalar, itercond=lambda o: None):
...
> for subelem in flatten_dict(elem, isScalar):
> yield subelem
I thought it was a little strange that it was *exactly* the same, given the
function call...
Corrected (still not much difference, though):
...>python timeit.py -c -s"import flatten" "flatten.pro_dict()"
100 loops, best of 3: 7.22e+003 usec per loop
...>python timeit.py -c -s"import flatten" "flatten.pro_fastcond()"
100 loops, best of 3: 7.33e+003 usec per loop
> I'll make up some fancy tree later to test out itercond.
Well, should have made it sooner. I would have noticed an empty list...
-- Francis Avila
- Next message: Stephen J. Bevan: "Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint"
- Previous message: Joachim Durchholz: "Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint"
- In reply to: Francis Avila: "Re: itertools.flatten()? and copying generators/iterators."
- Next in thread: Peter Otten: "Re: itertools.flatten()? and copying generators/iterators."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|