Re: What GUI toolkit looks the best?
From: Paul Rubin (//phr.cx_at_NOSPAM.invalid)
Date: 12/11/03
- Next message: Rafael T. Ugolini: "More than one cookie with urllib2"
- Previous message: r.e.s.: "optimization pointers?"
- In reply to: Bruno Desthuilliers: "Re: What GUI toolkit looks the best?"
- Next in thread: Brian Kelley: "Re: What GUI toolkit looks the best?"
- Reply: Brian Kelley: "Re: What GUI toolkit looks the best?"
- Reply: Bruno Desthuilliers: "Re: What GUI toolkit looks the best?"
- Reply: Peter Hansen: "Re: What GUI toolkit looks the best?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 11 Dec 2003 13:46:55 -0800
Bruno Desthuilliers <bdesth.nospam@removeme.free.fr> writes:
> > I guess
> > I can get the client to pay
>
> Why ? It's free (as in free beer and free speech)
I mean for the build tools (Visual C++ or whatever). I can't really
use the WxWindows source code without a way to compile it. I'm getting
discouraged to hear that WxWindows itself has numerous bugs though.
- Next message: Rafael T. Ugolini: "More than one cookie with urllib2"
- Previous message: r.e.s.: "optimization pointers?"
- In reply to: Bruno Desthuilliers: "Re: What GUI toolkit looks the best?"
- Next in thread: Brian Kelley: "Re: What GUI toolkit looks the best?"
- Reply: Brian Kelley: "Re: What GUI toolkit looks the best?"
- Reply: Bruno Desthuilliers: "Re: What GUI toolkit looks the best?"
- Reply: Peter Hansen: "Re: What GUI toolkit looks the best?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]