Re: 2.3 list reverse() bug?
From: Andrew MacIntyre (andymac_at_bullseye.apana.org.au)
Date: 12/28/03
- Next message: Simon Burton: "Re: Special-purpose extension of Python -- new kinds of objects"
- Previous message: Andrew MacIntyre: "Re: make test segfaults with "--enable-shared" on Python 2.3.3"
- In reply to: Alex Martelli: "Re: 2.3 list reverse() bug?"
- Next in thread: Robin Becker: "Re: 2.3 list reverse() bug?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 09:56:37 +1100 (EST) To: Alex Martelli <aleax@aleax.it>
> Apparently, these miniscule extra bits of overhead appear to be enough
> for Andrew to reject the "essentially equivalent" evaluation.
You have misconstrued the intent of my observation, which was simply to
highlight that there may be a reason other than aesthetics to choose one
of the 3 alternatives.
--
Andrew I MacIntyre "These thoughts are mine alone..."
E-mail: andymac@bullseye.apana.org.au (pref) | Snail: PO Box 370
andymac@pcug.org.au (alt) | Belconnen ACT 2616
Web: http://www.andymac.org/ | Australia
- Next message: Simon Burton: "Re: Special-purpose extension of Python -- new kinds of objects"
- Previous message: Andrew MacIntyre: "Re: make test segfaults with "--enable-shared" on Python 2.3.3"
- In reply to: Alex Martelli: "Re: 2.3 list reverse() bug?"
- Next in thread: Robin Becker: "Re: 2.3 list reverse() bug?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|