Re: Secure Voting software
From: Paul Rubin (//phr.cx_at_NOSPAM.invalid)
Date: 01/22/04
- Next message: Amy G: "Side note: Praise to the contibuters to this group"
- Previous message: Aahz: "Re: Accessing a shared generator from multiple threads."
- In reply to: PiedmontBiz: "Secure Voting software"
- Next in thread: Mark Jackson: "Re: Secure Voting software"
- Reply: Mark Jackson: "Re: Secure Voting software"
- Reply: Kirk Strauser: "Re: Secure Voting software"
- Reply: Cameron Laird: "Buffer overruns (was: Secure Voting software)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 21 Jan 2004 17:35:01 -0800
piedmontbiz@aol.com (PiedmontBiz) writes:
> What things must I keep in mind when I design a python application to be
> secure?
>
> Since python is developed using C, can python be free from the
> buffer overrun problems which plague other C programs?
Buffer overruns are just one narrow type of security failure.
Security is really a hard subject and even systems built by experts
often have security holes. There are various books written on how to
write secure software, and also some HOWTO's. For systems like voting
machines, there are a lot of non-software issues you have to deal with too.
The book "Security Engineering" by Ross Anderson is a good place to start
reading if you're interested in the subject.
- Next message: Amy G: "Side note: Praise to the contibuters to this group"
- Previous message: Aahz: "Re: Accessing a shared generator from multiple threads."
- In reply to: PiedmontBiz: "Secure Voting software"
- Next in thread: Mark Jackson: "Re: Secure Voting software"
- Reply: Mark Jackson: "Re: Secure Voting software"
- Reply: Kirk Strauser: "Re: Secure Voting software"
- Reply: Cameron Laird: "Buffer overruns (was: Secure Voting software)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|