Re: Accessing a shared generator from multiple threads.

From: Aahz (aahz_at_pythoncraft.com)
Date: 01/31/04 

Date: 30 Jan 2004 21:00:34 -0500

In article <cab22418.0401220800.1d5f8594@posting.google.com>,
Jim Jewett <JimJJewett@yahoo.com> wrote:
>aahz@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote in message news:<bun7cn$le7$1@panix1.panix.com>...
>>
>> My point is that I haven't (yet) seen many good use cases for sharing a
>> generator between threads, and I'm guessing that many people will try
>> using generators inappropriately for problems that really are better
>> suited to Queue.Queue.
>
>A globally unique ID, such as:
>
> "What filename should I store this page under?"
>
>The standard library has (several versions of) similar functionality
>for temporary filenames. They aren't all threadsafe, they often
>enforce the "temporary" aspect, they run into hashing collision
>problems eventually, there is no good way to include even approximate
>ordering information, etc...
>
>The fact that these are in the standard library suggests that it is a
>common use case. The fact that there are several different versions
>each with their own problems suggests that the problem is hard enough
>to justify putting a good solution in the library.

You've got a good point. All right, I suggest you subscribe to
python-dev (if you're not) and bring it up there so we can hash out
which location would be best for this functionality. 

-- 
Aahz (aahz@pythoncraft.com)           <*>         http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"The joy of coding Python should be in seeing short, concise, readable
classes that express a lot of action in a small amount of clear code -- 
not in reams of trivial code that bores the reader to death."  --GvR

Relevant Pages