Re: Parrot for Python
From: Paul Prescod (paul_at_prescod.net)
Date: 04/04/04
- Next message: Paul Watson: "Re: Typing \n in strings"
- Previous message: support_at_alcanet.com.au: "ALCATEL POLICY : your message has been refused"
- In reply to: John Roth: "Re: Parrot for Python"
- Next in thread: Roger Binns: "Re: Parrot for Python"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2004 16:19:20 -0800 To: John Roth <newsgroups@jhrothjr.com>
John Roth wrote:
>...
>
> I believe there were some people working on a Python
> port to Parrot a while ago, but they lost interest when
> the then current Parrot implementation was insufficient
> to handle what they wanted to do.
>
> It's all a volunteer effort; it'll get done if enough
> people want to get together to get it done.
The developers of Parrot are implementing Python on Parrot themselves.
http://www.hole.fi/jajvirta/weblog/20040108T2001.html
As of a month ago:
"Just in case anyone's keeping track, here are a few things that are
working:
• Bytecode loading
• Objects
• Method calls
• Operator Overloading
oh, yeah, and all that pesky math stuff, subroutines, and strings.
They work too, though Unicode needs some help. And variables. We can do
variables.
Still need some work on nested namespaces, actual bytecode translation,
and object performance, but..."
- Next message: Paul Watson: "Re: Typing \n in strings"
- Previous message: support_at_alcanet.com.au: "ALCATEL POLICY : your message has been refused"
- In reply to: John Roth: "Re: Parrot for Python"
- Next in thread: Roger Binns: "Re: Parrot for Python"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|