PEP 328 update

From: Aahz (aahz_at_pythoncraft.com)
Date: 05/02/04 

Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 15:20:32 -0400
To: python-announce@python.org, Python-List <python-list@python.org>

PEP 328 (``import`` changes) has been updated and is available at
http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0328.html

Comments on the revised version are welcome. One area where feedback is
particularly desired is on the frequency of relative imports inside
packages in current code, both in absolute terms and as a percentage of
all imports. 

-- 
Aahz (aahz@pythoncraft.com)           <*>         http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"I used to have a .sig but I found it impossible to please everyone..."  --SFJ

Relevant Pages

  • Re: PEP 328 update
    ... One area where feedback is ... > particularly desired is on the frequency of relative imports inside ... both in absolute terms and as a percentage of ... and leave the undecorated form ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • Re: PEP 328 update
    ... One area where feedback is ... >> particularly desired is on the frequency of relative imports inside ... both in absolute terms and as a percentage of ... and leave the undecorated form ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • Relative imports and "import X as Y"
    ... I was looking at PEP 328. ... dot syntax will only be allowed with the "from" import variety (e.g., ... will relative imports in Python 3.0 allow things like "import ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • Re: PEP 328 update
    ... Scott David Daniels wrote: ... >Aahz wrote: ... One area where feedback is ... >> particularly desired is on the frequency of relative imports inside ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • Re: PEP 322: Reverse Iteration (second revision, please comment)
    ... > Based on the feedback here on comp.lang.python, the pep has been ... or variations. ... Just my opinion, ...
    (comp.lang.python)