Performance boosts (was: New to Python: Features)
From: Cameron Laird (claird_at_lairds.us)
Date: 10/05/04
- Next message: Cameron Laird: "Still more performance chatter (was: New to Python: Features)"
- Previous message: Thomas Rast: "Re: re bug"
- In reply to: Andrew Dalke: "Re: New to Python: Features"
- Next in thread: Alex Martelli: "Re: New to Python: Features"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 12:08:08 GMT
In article <0Er8d.3258$M05.2333@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
Andrew Dalke <dalke@dalkescientific.com> wrote:
.
[much else]
.
.
>Then say so. There are Python to C converters which at best
>give about a 5% speed boost, so the answer to your original
>question would be "yes" but also not be the answer to your
>real question.
.
.
.
I don't want newcomers to read this in isolation and
conclude that the "speed" of Python falls far short
of that of C. There are several ways to accelerate
Python-coded executables; some of them, in at least
some circumstances, give increases that far surpass
5% of the original "speed". At the same time, serious
work in this area doesn't reduce responsibly to a
single figure of merit, so we're all reluctant to
sound like the detergent commercials that promise
"13% new and improved" or whatever it is they say.
- Next message: Cameron Laird: "Still more performance chatter (was: New to Python: Features)"
- Previous message: Thomas Rast: "Re: re bug"
- In reply to: Andrew Dalke: "Re: New to Python: Features"
- Next in thread: Alex Martelli: "Re: New to Python: Features"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|