Re: End of file

From: Alex Martelli (aleaxit_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 10/08/04 

Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 10:31:52 +0200

Nick Craig-Wood <nick@craig-wood.com> wrote:

> Alex Martelli <aleaxit@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > sentinel = []
> >
> > It's fine, but I would still suggest using the Canonical Pythonic Way To
> > Make a Sentinel Object:
> >
> > sentinel = object()
> >
> > Since an immediate instance of type object has no possible use except as
> > a unique, distinguishable placeholder, ``this thing here is a sentinel''.
>
> Yes a good idiom which I didn't know (still learning) - thanks!

You're welcome.

> This only works in python >= 2.2 according to my tests.

Yes, 2.2 is when Python acquired the 'object' built-in. If you need to
also support ancient versions of Python, it's often possible to do so by
clever initialization -- substituting your own coding if at startup you
find you're running under too-old versions. You presumably already do
that, e.g., for True and False, staticmethod, &c -- in the 2.3->2.4
transition it makes sense to do it for sorted, reversed, set, ... -- for
this specific issue of using object() for a sentinel, for example:

try: object
except NameError: def object(): return []

plus the usual optional stick-into-builtins, are all you need in your
application's initialization phase.

> Its also half the speed and 4 times the typing
>
> $ /usr/lib/python2.3/timeit.py 'object()'
> 1000000 loops, best of 3: 0.674 usec per loop
> $ /usr/lib/python2.3/timeit.py '[]'
> 1000000 loops, best of 3: 0.369 usec per loop
>
> But who's counting ;-)

Nobody, I sure hope. 's=[]' is just four characters, while 'sentinel =
[]', the usage you suggested (with proper spacing and a decent name), is
13, and yet it's pretty obvious the clarity of the latter is well worth
the triple typing; and if going to 'sentinel = object()' makes it
clearer yet, the lesser move from 13 to 19 (an extra-typing factor of
less than 1.5) is similarly well justified.
And I think it's unlikely you'll need so many sentinels as to notice the
extra 300 nanoseconds or so to instantiate each of them...

Alex

Relevant Pages

  • Re: initializing with empty list as default causes freaky problems
    ... Observe the following: ... I'm using Python 2.5.1. ... Since f.h and g.h both refer to the same list, updating f.h will also ... or, if None is an acceptable value, make a sentinel value ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • Re: How to do this in Python? - A "gotcha"
    ... This is the most pythonic solution yet. ... Thanks to all the responders who took time to ponder this seemingly ... I learned a lot about the Python mind-set. ... it wouldn't need to replace the current sentinel implementation... ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • Re: unbinding a global variable in Python
    ... Mark Tarver wrote: ... How is this done in Python? ... Often it is a better choice to initialize the global with a sentinel: ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • Re: Fast Dictionary Access
    ... One way to get a unique sentinel is: ... You can also use exception handling (this is quite efficient in Python) ...
    (comp.lang.python)