scripting languages vs statically compiled ones
From: Ajay (abra9823_at_mail.usyd.edu.au)
Date: 10/27/04
- Next message: Russell E. Owen: "Re: os.popen3 with windows; help?"
- Previous message: Terry Reedy: "Re: Please help - get average"
- Next in thread: Jeremy Jones: "Re: scripting languages vs statically compiled ones"
- Maybe reply: Jeremy Jones: "Re: scripting languages vs statically compiled ones"
- Reply: Cameron Laird: "Re: scripting languages vs statically compiled ones"
- Reply: Peter Hansen: "Re: scripting languages vs statically compiled ones"
- Reply: beliavsky_at_aol.com: "Re: scripting languages vs statically compiled ones"
- Reply: Torben Ęgidius Mogensen: "Re: scripting languages vs statically compiled ones"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 03:26:14 +1000 To: python-list@python.org
hi!
is there an authoritative source on the performance of scripting languages
such as python vs. something like java, c, c++.
its for a report, so it would be awesome if i could quote some well-known
authority on this.
thanks
cheers
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
- Next message: Russell E. Owen: "Re: os.popen3 with windows; help?"
- Previous message: Terry Reedy: "Re: Please help - get average"
- Next in thread: Jeremy Jones: "Re: scripting languages vs statically compiled ones"
- Maybe reply: Jeremy Jones: "Re: scripting languages vs statically compiled ones"
- Reply: Cameron Laird: "Re: scripting languages vs statically compiled ones"
- Reply: Peter Hansen: "Re: scripting languages vs statically compiled ones"
- Reply: beliavsky_at_aol.com: "Re: scripting languages vs statically compiled ones"
- Reply: Torben Ęgidius Mogensen: "Re: scripting languages vs statically compiled ones"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|