Re: What is Python's answer to Perl 6?
From: Jonathan Ellis (jbellis_at_gmail.com)
Date: 10/30/04
- Next message: Irmen de Jong: "Re: Plugin system"
- Previous message: Reinhold Birkenfeld: "Plugin system"
- In reply to: A.M. Kuchling: "Re: What is Python's answer to Perl 6?"
- Next in thread: Reinhold Birkenfeld: "Re: What is Python's answer to Perl 6?"
- Reply: Reinhold Birkenfeld: "Re: What is Python's answer to Perl 6?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 30 Oct 2004 06:47:44 -0700
A.M. Kuchling wrote:
> The list of features for Python 3000 is described in PEP 3000,
> appropriately enough:
>
> http://www.python.org/peps/pep-3000.html
>
> Most of the suggested changes remove redundancy, such as removing
> now-unneeded built-in functions and language features.
I'm sure this has been brought up before, but a quick google search
didn't find anything on moving [has|get|set]attr into attributes of
object. Why wouldn't this be considered a Good Thing? Just because
Ruby people would like it? :)
-Jonathan
- Next message: Irmen de Jong: "Re: Plugin system"
- Previous message: Reinhold Birkenfeld: "Plugin system"
- In reply to: A.M. Kuchling: "Re: What is Python's answer to Perl 6?"
- Next in thread: Reinhold Birkenfeld: "Re: What is Python's answer to Perl 6?"
- Reply: Reinhold Birkenfeld: "Re: What is Python's answer to Perl 6?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]