Re: What is Python's answer to Perl 6?
From: Aahz (aahz_at_pythoncraft.com)
Date: 10/31/04
- Next message: Robert Brewer: "RE: Python-list Info Page"
- Previous message: Patrick Maupin: "Re: scripting languages vs statically compiled ones"
- In reply to: John Roth: "Re: What is Python's answer to Perl 6?"
- Next in thread: Max M: "Re: What is Python's answer to Perl 6?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 31 Oct 2004 00:37:37 -0400
In article <10o821fqaiahu31@news.supernews.com>,
John Roth <newsgroups@jhrothjr.com> wrote:
>
>I suspect that the performance issue is being clouded by the
>reference counting mechanism in CPython. Modern garbage collectors
>are reputedly significantly faster. If Python 3.0 removes reference
>counting it might speed up substantially. Note that IronPython is
>reported to run at the same (or better) speed as CPython, even
>though the CLR is not optimized for running scripting languages.
IronPython also doesn't have to worry about random C libraries. That's
one reason why refcounting works better in CPython.
-- Aahz (aahz@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ WiFi is the SCSI of the 21st Century -- there are fundamental technical reasons for sacrificing a goat. (with no apologies to John Woods)
- Next message: Robert Brewer: "RE: Python-list Info Page"
- Previous message: Patrick Maupin: "Re: scripting languages vs statically compiled ones"
- In reply to: John Roth: "Re: What is Python's answer to Perl 6?"
- Next in thread: Max M: "Re: What is Python's answer to Perl 6?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|