Re: Securing a future for anonymous functions in Python
From: Paul Rubin (//phr.cx_at_NOSPAM.invalid)
Date: 01/07/05
- Next message: Steve Holden: "Re: Securing a future for anonymous functions in Python"
- Previous message: Anna: "Re: Securing a future for anonymous functions in Python"
- In reply to: Anna: "Re: Securing a future for anonymous functions in Python"
- Next in thread: Steve Holden: "Re: Securing a future for anonymous functions in Python"
- Reply: Steve Holden: "Re: Securing a future for anonymous functions in Python"
- Reply: Nick Coghlan: "Re: Securing a future for anonymous functions in Python"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 07 Jan 2005 04:12:54 -0800
"Anna" <annaraven@gmail.com> writes:
> Having taken some calculus (derivatives, limits, some integrals) but
> never even heard of lambda calculus, to me, lambda means absolutely
> NOTHING. Less than nothing.
Lambda calculus is from mathematical logic, but more to the point
"lambda" has been the term used in Lisp for this operation since time
immemorial. Since the kinds of programmers who want to use anonymous
functions have probably been exposed to Lisp at one time or another,
"lambda" should not cause any confusion.
- Next message: Steve Holden: "Re: Securing a future for anonymous functions in Python"
- Previous message: Anna: "Re: Securing a future for anonymous functions in Python"
- In reply to: Anna: "Re: Securing a future for anonymous functions in Python"
- Next in thread: Steve Holden: "Re: Securing a future for anonymous functions in Python"
- Reply: Steve Holden: "Re: Securing a future for anonymous functions in Python"
- Reply: Nick Coghlan: "Re: Securing a future for anonymous functions in Python"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|