RE: Pystone benchmark: Win vs. Linux (again)
From: Delaney, Timothy C (Timothy) (tdelaney_at_avaya.com)
Date: 01/31/05
- Next message: Jamey Cribbs: "Re: ANNOUNCE: KirbyBase 1.7"
- Previous message: Tim Peters: "Re: pickle, cPickle, & HIGHEST_PROTOCOL"
- Maybe in reply to: Franco Fiorese: "Pystone benchmark: Win vs. Linux (again)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 10:02:12 +1100 To: <python-list@python.org>
Franco Fiorese wrote:
> * Windows XP Pro: 16566.7 pystones/second
> * Linux (kernel 2.6.9 NPTL): 12346.2 pystones/second
First of all, realise that pystone is not meant to be a general-purpose
benchmarking program. It test a specific, *small* subset of the
functionality available in Python. It's also not meant to be able to
compare across machines, etc. It's highly susceptible to cache effects
and various other things.
If you include parrotbench you will get a better view of things, but
it's also not designed for comparisons across machines.
Tim Delaney
- Next message: Jamey Cribbs: "Re: ANNOUNCE: KirbyBase 1.7"
- Previous message: Tim Peters: "Re: pickle, cPickle, & HIGHEST_PROTOCOL"
- Maybe in reply to: Franco Fiorese: "Pystone benchmark: Win vs. Linux (again)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
