Re: [perl-python] string pattern matching
From: Dan Perl (danperl_at_rogers.com)
Date: 02/02/05
- Next message: Erik Max Francis: "Re: [perl-python] string pattern matching"
- Previous message: kpp9c: "permutations, patterns, and probability"
- In reply to: Daniel Fackrell: "Re: [perl-python] string pattern matching"
- Next in thread: Erik Max Francis: "Re: [perl-python] string pattern matching"
- Reply: Erik Max Francis: "Re: [perl-python] string pattern matching"
- Reply: Stephen Thorne: "Re: [perl-python] string pattern matching"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 18:59:18 -0500
Perhaps someone will write a program to automatically follow up on every
[perl-python] posting? The follow-up could just contain a statement like
the one Daniel mentions. Obviously the program would be written in python.
;-)
Any suggestions on how to implement such a program? How would it detect a
new posting? How would it send the follow-up?
Anyway, I agree with Daniel and I think that would not only warn newcomers
to the group, but it would also allow many of us to move on without worrying
about the effect that the perl-python postings may have on these newcomers.
BTW, I think Daniel's suggestion for the statement sounds pretty fair and
pretty impartial. Maybe it should just not use terms like "blatant". And I
would include something like "we support everyone's freedom to post to this
newsgroup but we feel that python and perl beginners need to be warned about
the quality of these tutorials".
Dan
"Daniel Fackrell" <unlearned@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:mailman.1716.1107300060.22381.python-list@python.org...
> Perhaps a message to the effect of "These messages are specifically
> disowned
> by the groups to which they are posted, have historically been riddled
> with
> blatant errors, and are assumed to continue in the same quality." should
> be
> posted as a follow-up to each of these messages by XL in order to avoid
> having to spend the time to find the inaccuracies in each one
> individually.
>
> Considering the response so far, a list of frequent posters and
> not-so-frequent posters who will vouch for the accuracy of the disclaimer
> might even be added.
>
> Daniel Fackrell
>
>
>
- Next message: Erik Max Francis: "Re: [perl-python] string pattern matching"
- Previous message: kpp9c: "permutations, patterns, and probability"
- In reply to: Daniel Fackrell: "Re: [perl-python] string pattern matching"
- Next in thread: Erik Max Francis: "Re: [perl-python] string pattern matching"
- Reply: Erik Max Francis: "Re: [perl-python] string pattern matching"
- Reply: Stephen Thorne: "Re: [perl-python] string pattern matching"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|