Re: [EVALUATION] - E01: The Java Failure - May Python Helps?
From: Ilias Lazaridis (ilias_at_lazaridis.com)
Date: 02/06/05
- Next message: jordan2856977: "Re: sos!"
- Previous message: Dan Perl: "Re: CGI POST problem was: How to read POSTed data"
- In reply to: Terry Reedy: "Re: [EVALUATION] - E01: The Java Failure - May Python Helps?"
- Next in thread: Terry Reedy: "Re: [EVALUATION] - E01: The Java Failure - May Python Helps?"
- Reply: Terry Reedy: "Re: [EVALUATION] - E01: The Java Failure - May Python Helps?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 07:39:04 +0200
Terry Reedy wrote:
> "Ilias Lazaridis" <ilias@lazaridis.com> wrote in message
> news:cu2m3q$km1$1@usenet.otenet.gr...
>
> If you ask too much that other people do your searching for you, answers
> will dry up.
I don't ask people to search for me.
I ask people for their specific knowledge about specific python language
constructs.
This is a simple cooperation.
I've spend very much time to extract this specifi evaluation template:
http://lazaridis.com/case/stack/index.html#evaluation
Python community can 'fill' it quickly with the relevant technology (if
it exists).
The evaluation result can serve as a fundamental part for a _practical_
showcase how Python beats Java.
> But here are a couple that you might not find on google
> anyway, at least not easily.
thank you.
>>I want to add metadata to everything within my design (functions, data,
>>classes, ...), if possible with a standard way.
>
> You can annotate, by adding attributes to, modules, functions, classes, and
> class instances. You can not directly do so with 'basic' types: numbers,
> sequences, and dicts -- and some others. You can, however, either extend
> or wrap anything with your own classes to get something you can annotate
> (but don't ask me for the details).
=> {annotation via attributes on modules, functions, classes and objects}
=> {not available with basic types (numbers, sequences, dicts, ...) }
=> {unconfirmed: possibility to extend/wrap basic types with own classes}
>>I want to generate things (code, txt, html etc.) out of my object-model,
>> whilst using with a flexible generator, if possible a standard one.
>
> One standard way to generate text from objects is to use custom classes,
> each with a custom __str__ method.
[...]
> Then 'print html_doc_instance' can print the html doc
> corresponding to the object model.
I understand this procedure.
I would like to use a standard way, which uses the standard metadata
[implicit/explicit defined].
Does such standard exist?
> Like others, I recommend you spend a day with Python if you wish to learn
> more.
I am spending "a day" with it's community.
.
-- http://lazaridis.com
- Next message: jordan2856977: "Re: sos!"
- Previous message: Dan Perl: "Re: CGI POST problem was: How to read POSTed data"
- In reply to: Terry Reedy: "Re: [EVALUATION] - E01: The Java Failure - May Python Helps?"
- Next in thread: Terry Reedy: "Re: [EVALUATION] - E01: The Java Failure - May Python Helps?"
- Reply: Terry Reedy: "Re: [EVALUATION] - E01: The Java Failure - May Python Helps?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|