Re: best XSLT processor?
uche.ogbuji_at_gmail.com
Date: 03/01/05
- Next message: Brett C: "python-dev Summary for 2005-01-16 through 2005-01-31"
- Previous message: uche.ogbuji_at_gmail.com: "Re: best XSLT processor?"
- Maybe in reply to: uche.ogbuji_at_gmail.com: "Re: best XSLT processor?"
- Next in thread: Steve Holden: "Re: best XSLT processor?"
- Reply: Steve Holden: "Re: best XSLT processor?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 28 Feb 2005 19:14:09 -0800
This is a good way to kick off a tussle among interested parties, but
hinestly, at this point, most packages work fine. In my opinion your
rade-off right now is raw speed (e.g. libxslt) versus flexibility (e.g.
4Suite). All are bug-free enough that you'd have to be doing somethign
*very* exotic to run into trouble.
Just pick one or two and try them.
http://uche.ogbuji.net/tech/akara/nodes/2003-01-01/python-xslt
--Uche
- Next message: Brett C: "python-dev Summary for 2005-01-16 through 2005-01-31"
- Previous message: uche.ogbuji_at_gmail.com: "Re: best XSLT processor?"
- Maybe in reply to: uche.ogbuji_at_gmail.com: "Re: best XSLT processor?"
- Next in thread: Steve Holden: "Re: best XSLT processor?"
- Reply: Steve Holden: "Re: best XSLT processor?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
