Re: Thoughts on some stdlib modules
- From: "Kay Schluehr" <kay.schluehr@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 10 Apr 2005 01:01:39 -0700
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> Is it good that people write these wrappers?
No.
> I don't think so. Is it
> the library's fault? I don't think so, either. People write these
> wrappers because they cannot remember how to use the library.
I slightly disagree. It's a symptom. The example of the path-module is
instructive because it actually represents path objects not just a
bunch of functions in isolation that manipulate strings that can be
interpreted as paths. I started to read in the lib.py documentation of
pypy and again I found the reference to the path-module. Different
people seem to share similar ideas and claim about inconveniencies. I
use the path-module by myself for a year. This indicates that there is
something wrong or missing in the std-library.
Regards,
Kay
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Thoughts on some stdlib modules
- From: "Martin v. Löwis"
- Re: Thoughts on some stdlib modules
- References:
- Thoughts on some stdlib modules
- From: vegetax
- Re: Thoughts on some stdlib modules
- From: "Martin v. Löwis"
- Thoughts on some stdlib modules
- Prev by Date: Does Tk provide ComboBox ?
- Next by Date: Re: Are circular dependencies possible in Python?
- Previous by thread: Re: Thoughts on some stdlib modules
- Next by thread: Re: Thoughts on some stdlib modules
- Index(es):