Re: Python Challenge ahead [NEW] for riddle lovers
- From: Mike Rovner <mrovner@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 21:30:41 -0700
David Murmann wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
That was pretty fun. Good for a Friday. Too bad it comes to an abrupt "temporary end".
Shane
P.S. I hope I didn't hammer your server on step 3. I was missing the mark. :-)
Interestingly step 3 is actually wrong... there is an additional solution, which looks like cqqmsxk. (I don't think that spoils the fun :))
3 IS wrong because if you use any not BIG letter after bodyguard on both sides, you get extra 'eCQQmSXK\n' which slow me down for 5 minutes.
Mike
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Python Challenge ahead [NEW] for riddle lovers
- From: Roel Schroeven
- Re: Python Challenge ahead [NEW] for riddle lovers
- References:
- Python Challenge ahead [NEW] for riddle lovers
- From: pythonchallenge
- Re: Python Challenge ahead [NEW] for riddle lovers
- From: Shane Hathaway
- Re: Python Challenge ahead [NEW] for riddle lovers
- From: David Murmann
- Python Challenge ahead [NEW] for riddle lovers
- Prev by Date: Re: Micro-PEP: str.translate(None) to mean identity translation
- Next by Date: "implementation" of PEP 262 as an academic project
- Previous by thread: Re: Python Challenge ahead [NEW] for riddle lovers
- Next by thread: Re: Python Challenge ahead [NEW] for riddle lovers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|