Re: DB API 2.0 and transactions
- From: Stuart Bishop <stuart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 14:13:49 +1000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Magnus Lycka wrote:
> Another option would be to investigate if any of the other postgreSQL
> drivers have a more correct behaviour. The non-standard behaviour that
> you describe it obvious from the pgdb source. See:
> http://www.pygresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pygresql/module/pgdb.py?rev=1.27
fwiw psycopg 1.1.18 has the correct behavior (as usual).
I can add this test to the DB-API 2.0 Anal Compliance Test Suite if we want,
although it sounds like it is only an issue with PostgreSQL drivers.
- --
Stuart Bishop <stuart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://www.stuartbishop.net/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCsk3oAfqZj7rGN0oRAjHAAJ4kQzxJXFW6hX6Q1t896fMzT0EUjACgkBhw
X4wB17+4FwO9TsKpiIBJB50=
=mYfn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.
- References:
- DB API 2.0 and transactions
- From: Christopher J. Bottaro
- Re: DB API 2.0 and transactions
- From: Magnus Lycka
- Re: DB API 2.0 and transactions
- From: Christopher J. Bottaro
- Re: DB API 2.0 and transactions
- From: Magnus Lycka
- DB API 2.0 and transactions
- Prev by Date: Re: substitue for LISTS and TUPLEs in C++
- Next by Date: Re: 1980's Home Computer-style Package.
- Previous by thread: Re: DB API 2.0 and transactions
- Next by thread: different time tuple format
- Index(es):