Re: Accepted Summer of Code proposals
- From: Peter Decker <pydecker@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 16:05:40 -0400
On 7/3/05, Robert Kern <rkern@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I would suggest not speculating on biased or malicious intentions. It is
> possible that no one applied with a proposal to work on Dabo, or that
> such a proposal was poorly written, or that the author had too little
> experience, or any number of other things.
I wasn't implying malicious intentions; if that's the way it read, I
apologize. I only meant to express surprise.
I know that there was a proposal from Dabo, but I don't know much more
than that. I've simply been following both projects for some time now,
and find that the Dabo folks have done so much more in much less time,
and that their stuff seems so much more straightforward. Wax seems to
be slowly drifting along, while Dabo is moving ahead steadily.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: A Policy for Inclusion in the Standard Library: was Modules forinclusion in standard library?
- Next by Date: Re: What are the other options against Zope?
- Previous by thread: Re: Accepted Summer of Code proposals
- Next by thread: Re: Accepted Summer of Code proposals
- Index(es):