Re: Bicycle Repair Man usability

Eclipse's java refactoring tool puts BRM to shame. This probably has a
lot to do with the static typing of Java and the JDTs nice built in
compiler. When doing Java development the refactoring support is
really nice (and using a nice ide make's java development almost as
easy as python, since the ide can do the typing for you;) ).

I'd like to hear other's experiences with refactoring in python. Most
of the projects I work on are quite small relative to some of the Java
projects I've worked on. Are people using BRM? Or is refactoring in
python just as easy by hand? Or is refactoring just a java based
activity....

matt

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Lisp v. Java/Eclipse
    ... It is best tool for doing refactoring in Java. ... (format t "foo ~A~%" foo))) ... reflection in Java, but I wouldn't count on this. ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: Lisp v. Java/Eclipse
    ... (format t "foo ~A~%" foo))) ... Who thinks that Java is especially suited for refactoring tools is misguided. ... In Lisp I also use a refactoring tool. ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: Java and .NET (no Flames Pls)
    ... I stand corrected on the refactoring, but I had it with some third party ... problems with Java IDEs in other areas. ... from Visual Studio .NET 2003, which is already a great IDE overall. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework)
  • Re: Still clinking to Java?
    ... >>>language that doesn't support redefinition of functions at runtime? ... In the tools that have sprung up around the Java ... >> sexp-oriented commands are refactoring commands in the Martin Fowler ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: Still clinking to Java?
    ... > - Better refactoring support in Java than in Common Lisp? ... Not in Java. ... sexp-oriented commands are refactoring commands in the Martin Fowler ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)