Re: reg email packages work
- From: Steve Holden <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 23:28:19 -0500
praba kar wrote:
Does this mean you can't let us see it, or that you still don't understand what we want to see? Without knowing what you are passing to the sendmail process we can't tell what's wrong, not being psychic :-)--- Sybren Stuvel <sybrenUSE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Steve Holden enlightened us with:
It's obvious you aren't using that EXACT code,
because it doesn't
formulate a three-paragraph message. So the bit we
really need to
see is how you capture and formulate the argument
to set_payload().
I'd rather see what I asked for, which is the output of msg.as_string(). That contains all that's sent to the client.
msg.as_string() have all the client data(which include headers and body of the message
regards Steve -- Steve Holden +44 150 684 7255 +1 800 494 3119 Holden Web LLC http://www.holdenweb.com/
.
- References:
- Re: reg email packages work
- From: Sybren Stuvel
- Re: reg email packages work
- Prev by Date: Re: Adding bound methods dynamically... CORRECTED
- Next by Date: Re: Uploading images via cgi?
- Previous by thread: Re: reg email packages work
- Next by thread: Re: reg email packages work
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|