Re: Bug in string.find; was: Re: Proposed PEP: New style indexing,was Re: Bug in slice type
- From: Antoon Pardon <apardon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Aug 2005 08:01:16 GMT
Op 2005-08-31, Bengt Richter schreef <bokr@xxxxxx>:
> On 31 Aug 2005 07:26:48 GMT, Antoon Pardon <apardon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>Op 2005-08-30, Bengt Richter schreef <bokr@xxxxxx>:
>>> On 30 Aug 2005 10:07:06 GMT, Antoon Pardon <apardon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Op 2005-08-30, Terry Reedy schreef <tjreedy@xxxxxxxx>:
>>>>>
>>>>> "Paul Rubin" <"http://phr.cx"@NOSPAM.invalid> wrote in message
>>>>> news:7xy86k3r7n.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>>> Really it's x[-1]'s behavior that should go, not find/rfind.
>>>>>
>>>>> I complete disagree, x[-1] as an abbreviation of x[len(x)-1] is extremely
>>>>> useful, especially when 'x' is an expression instead of a name.
>>>>
>>>>I don't think the ability to easily index sequences from the right is
>>>>in dispute. Just the fact that negative numbers on their own provide
>>>>this functionality.
>>>>
>>>>Because I sometimes find it usefull to have a sequence start and
>>>>end at arbitrary indexes, I have written a table class. So I
>>>>can have a table that is indexed from e.g. -4 to +6. So how am
>>>>I supposed to easily get at that last value?
>>> Give it a handy property? E.g.,
>>>
>>> table.as_python_list[-1]
>>
>>Your missing the point, I probably didn't make it clear.
>>
>>It is not about the possibilty of doing such a thing. It is
>>about python providing a frame for such things that work
>>in general without the need of extra properties in 'special'
>>cases.
>>
> How about interpreting seq[i] as an abbreviation of seq[i%len(seq)] ?
> That would give a consitent interpretation of seq[-1] and no errors
> for any value ;-)
But the question was not about having a consistent interpretation for
-1, but about an easy way to get the last value.
But I like your idea. I just think there should be two differnt ways
to index. maybe use braces in one case.
seq{i} would be pure indexing, that throws exceptions if you
are out of bound
seq[i] would then be seq{i%len(seq)}
--
Antoon Pardon
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Bug in slice type
- From: bryanjugglercryptographer
- Re: Bug in slice type
- From: Steven Bethard
- Re: Bug in slice type
- From: Steven Bethard
- Proposed PEP: New style indexing, was Re: Bug in slice type
- From: Bryan Olson
- Bug in string.find; was: Re: Proposed PEP: New style indexing, was Re: Bug in slice type
- From: Bryan Olson
- Re: Bug in string.find; was: Re: Proposed PEP: New style indexing, was Re: Bug in slice type
- From: Steve Holden
- Re: Bug in string.find; was: Re: Proposed PEP: New style indexing, was Re: Bug in slice type
- From: Bryan Olson
- Re: Bug in string.find; was: Re: Proposed PEP: New style indexing, was Re: Bug in slice type
- From: Antoon Pardon
- Re: Bug in string.find; was: Re: Proposed PEP: New style indexing, was Re: Bug in slice type
- From: Bryan Olson
- Re: Bug in string.find; was: Re: Proposed PEP: New style indexing, was Re: Bug in slice type
- From: Steve Holden
- Re: Bug in string.find; was: Re: Proposed PEP: New style indexing, was Re: Bug in slice type
- From: Bryan Olson
- Re: Bug in string.find; was: Re: Proposed PEP: New style indexing, was Re: Bug in slice type
- From: Steve Holden
- Re: Bug in string.find; was: Re: Proposed PEP: New style indexing, was Re: Bug in slice type
- From: Antoon Pardon
- Re: Bug in string.find; was: Re: Proposed PEP: New style indexing,was Re: Bug in slice type
- From: Terry Reedy
- Re: Bug in string.find; was: Re: Proposed PEP: New style indexing,was Re: Bug in slice type
- From: Paul Rubin
- Re: Bug in string.find; was: Re: Proposed PEP: New style indexing,was Re: Bug in slice type
- From: Terry Reedy
- Re: Bug in string.find; was: Re: Proposed PEP: New style indexing,was Re: Bug in slice type
- From: Antoon Pardon
- Re: Bug in string.find; was: Re: Proposed PEP: New style indexing,was Re: Bug in slice type
- From: Bengt Richter
- Re: Bug in string.find; was: Re: Proposed PEP: New style indexing,was Re: Bug in slice type
- From: Antoon Pardon
- Re: Bug in string.find; was: Re: Proposed PEP: New style indexing,was Re: Bug in slice type
- From: Bengt Richter
- Re: Bug in slice type
- Prev by Date: Re: Bug in string.find; was: Re: Proposed PEP: New style indexing,was Re: Bug in slice type
- Next by Date: Re: Adding bound methods dynamically...
- Previous by thread: Re: Bug in string.find; was: Re: Proposed PEP: New style indexing,was Re: Bug in slice type
- Next by thread: Re: Bug in string.find; was: Re: Proposed PEP: New style indexing,was Re: Bug in slice type
- Index(es):