Re: Premature wakeup of time.sleep()
- From: Peter Hansen <peter@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:33:07 -0400
Steve Horsley wrote:
I think the sleep times are quantised to the granularity of the system clock, shich varies from os to os. From memory, windows 95 has a 55mS timer, NT is less (19mS?), Linux and solaris 1mS. All this is from
For the record, the correct value for NT/XP family is about 15.6 ms (possibly exactly 64 per second and thus 15.625ms, but offhand I don't recall, though I'm sure Google does).
-Peter .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Premature wakeup of time.sleep()
- From: Bengt Richter
- Re: Premature wakeup of time.sleep()
- References:
- Premature wakeup of time.sleep()
- From: Erich Schreiber
- Re: Premature wakeup of time.sleep()
- From: Steve Horsley
- Premature wakeup of time.sleep()
- Prev by Date: Re: improvements for the logging package
- Next by Date: Re: packaging python for install.
- Previous by thread: Re: Premature wakeup of time.sleep()
- Next by thread: Re: Premature wakeup of time.sleep()
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|