Re: Automatic binding of **kwargs to variables
- From: aleaxit@xxxxxxxxx (Alex Martelli)
- Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 22:22:14 -0700
lbolognini@xxxxxxxxx <lbolognini@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...
> def foo(**kwargs):
> expected_form1_kwargs = ["arg1", "arg2"]
>
> for name in expected_form1_kwargs:
> if name not in kwargs:
> kwargs[name]=None
>
> for name in kwargs:
> if name in kwargs and name not in expected_form1_kwargs:
> raise ValueError, "Unrecognized keyword: " + name
>
> print kwargs
I find this style of coding repulsive when compared to:
def foo(arg1=None, arg2=None):
print dict(arg1=arg1, arg2=arg2)
I don't understand what added value all of those extra, contorted lines
are supposed to bring to the party.
Alex
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Automatic binding of **kwargs to variables
- From: lbolognini@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Automatic binding of **kwargs to variables
- From: bonono@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Automatic binding of **kwargs to variables
- References:
- Automatic binding of **kwargs to variables
- From: lbolognini@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Automatic binding of **kwargs to variables
- From: lbolognini@xxxxxxxxx
- Automatic binding of **kwargs to variables
- Prev by Date: Re: Expanding Python as a macro language
- Next by Date: Re: Automatic binding of **kwargs to variables
- Previous by thread: Re: Automatic binding of **kwargs to variables
- Next by thread: Re: Automatic binding of **kwargs to variables
- Index(es):