Re: best cumulative sum
- From: "David Isaac" <aisaac0@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:19:22 GMT
<bonono@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1132553397.042444.147660@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> He seems to want scanl
Yes. But it's not in Python, right?
(I know about Keller's version.)
Robert Kern wrote:
> Define better. More accurate? Less code?
Good point.
As Bonono (?) suggested: I'd most like a solution that
relies on a built-in to give me both of those.
(Pretty is good too.) Like SciPy's cumsum.
Thanks,
Alan Isaac
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: best cumulative sum
- From: bonono@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: best cumulative sum
- From: Colin J. Williams
- Re: best cumulative sum
- References:
- best cumulative sum
- From: David Isaac
- Re: best cumulative sum
- From: Micah Elliott
- Re: best cumulative sum
- From: Erik Max Francis
- Re: best cumulative sum
- From: bonono@xxxxxxxxx
- best cumulative sum
- Prev by Date: Re: Numeric array in unittest problem
- Next by Date: Re: writing a generic method
- Previous by thread: Re: best cumulative sum
- Next by thread: Re: best cumulative sum
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|