Re: best cumulative sum
- From: "David Isaac" <aisaac0@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 18:48:56 GMT
"Peter Otten" <__peter__@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dm95or$dkt$03$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I think that the test for an empty iterator makes ireduce() unintuitive.
OK.
I misunderstood you point.
But that is needed to match the behavior of reduce.
>>> reduce(operator.add,[],42)
42
Thanks,
Alan
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: best cumulative sum
- From: Peter Otten
- Re: best cumulative sum
- References:
- best cumulative sum
- From: David Isaac
- Re: best cumulative sum
- From: Micah Elliott
- Re: best cumulative sum
- From: Erik Max Francis
- Re: best cumulative sum
- From: bonono@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: best cumulative sum
- From: David Isaac
- Re: best cumulative sum
- From: Colin J. Williams
- Re: best cumulative sum
- From: David Isaac
- Re: best cumulative sum
- From: Michael Spencer
- Re: best cumulative sum
- From: bonono@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: best cumulative sum
- From: David Isaac
- Re: best cumulative sum
- From: Peter Otten
- Re: best cumulative sum
- From: David Isaac
- Re: best cumulative sum
- From: Peter Otten
- Re: best cumulative sum
- From: David Isaac
- Re: best cumulative sum
- From: Peter Otten
- Re: best cumulative sum
- From: David Isaac
- Re: best cumulative sum
- From: Peter Otten
- best cumulative sum
- Prev by Date: Re: Estimating memory use?
- Next by Date: Re: Estimating memory use?
- Previous by thread: Re: best cumulative sum
- Next by thread: Re: best cumulative sum
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|