Re: Another newbie question

aleax@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Alex Martelli) writes:
> > I could imagine using Python's built-in complex numbers to represent
> > 2D points. They're immutable, last I checked. I don't see a big
> > conflict.
>
> No big conflict at all -- as I recall, last I checked, computation on
> complex numbers was optimized enough to make them an excellent choice
> for 2D points' internal representations. I suspect you wouldn't want to
> *expose* them as such (e.g. by inheriting) but rather wrap them, because
> referring to the .real and .imag "coordinates" of a point (rather than
> .x and .y) IS rather weird. Wrapping would also leave you the choice of
> making 2D coordinates a class with mutable instances, if you wish,
> reducing the choice of a complex rather than two reals to a "mere
> implementation detail";-).

Right, you could use properties to make point.x get the real part of
an internal complex number. But now you're back to point.x being an
accessor function; you've just set things up so you can call it
without parentheses, like in Perl. E.g.

a = point.x
b = point.x
assert (a is b) # can fail

for that matter

assert (point.x is point.x)

can fail. These attributes aren't "member variables" any more.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The s x construction
    ... usage in existing mathematics. ... It is merely the existence of a sign at the front of zero that we are ... In the reals we always have the ... expose a conflict or even a resolution. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: The s x construction
    ... meaningless and so I snicker along with you here. ... denying zero a sign can now see that they are mistaken to reject the ... expose a conflict or even a resolution. ... dealt out as a subset of the reals. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: The s x construction
    ... meaningless and so I snicker along with you here. ... denying zero a sign can now see that they are mistaken to reject the ... expose a conflict or even a resolution. ... dealt out as a subset of the reals. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Heads up
    ... The updating to the new ppp-2.4.2-3.FC2.1.i386.rpm or ... ppp-2.4.2-3.FC2.1.x86_64.rpm may fail (conflict issue) unless you also ... M$ Senior VP Bob Muglia '96 ...
    (alt.os.linux.redhat)
  • Heads up
    ... The updating to the new ppp-2.4.2-3.FC2.1.i386.rpm or ... ppp-2.4.2-3.FC2.1.x86_64.rpm may fail (conflict issue) unless you also ... M$ Senior VP Bob Muglia '96 ...
    (linux.redhat)