Re: - E04 - Leadership! Google, Guido van Rossum, PSF
- From: Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 12:29:21 +0200
Alex Martelli wrote:
Anton Vredegoor <anton.vredegoor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
No insider information is necessary, the job requirements make it absolutely clear (at least to me) that Google is a company with an elitist culture,
Absolutely yes, in terms of who we want to work at Google: we DO want GREAT people. And we don't keep this a secret, either: right up there at <http://www.google.com/jobs/>, we say "our strategy is simple: we hire great people". Rather than hiring a LOT of people, we prefer to be extremely, obsessively selective, and try to hire ONLY a few people, ones who we can convince ourselves do deserve that adjective, "great".
This does mean that we definitely tend err on the side of caution, and FAIL to hire some people who are also great, just because we can't determine with sufficient certainty that they indeed are -- I've seen this happen more than once, and deeply regret it (for both Google and the person), but I have no idea how we could do better without relaxing our extremely elitist standards (we do debate these issues internally all of the time, trying to do better, but have found no magic wand yet).
[...]
students), but I've met many people with advanced degrees from even the best/most elitist universities, such as Stanford or MIT, where it sure looked to me as if the university's attempts to only graduate the very best have definitely failed.
[...]
Requiring a certain title for a job is mostly a desperate attempt to reduce the huge amount of work and effort it takes to hire great people, whittling down the number of resumes to be considered divided by the number of hires from the high thousands to the low hundreds. If there were available infinite resources for the job of hiring/selection, we could easily interview, say, 6000 candidates for a post, giving each a week or so of concentrated attention to probe their abilities; alas, this would require about 120 person-years from our people for the selection process. So, if nobody at Google did ANYTHING BUT interview candidates, given that we have a bit over 5000 employees now, we could hire in the course of 2006 another 40 or so, without doing anything else. (The numbers are all off the top of my head, but I think they may be roughly the right orders of magnitude).
This is just impractical: we need to hire many more than 40, AND cannot afford to have all existing employees do nothing but select new ones. So, we need to shrink the ratio drastically, on both factors: say 10 instead of 40 hours of selection per candidate, and 50 rather than 6000 candidates being considered per post. So we perform selection in stages, and most candidates out of those many thousands-per-job are "weeded out" at the very first stage, e.g. by failing to meet specific qualifications.
I wish that, as you say, "titles" were indeed strong indications of excellence. Unfortunately, they aren't, but in some cases they're better than nothing. Many of our job descriptions, as I pointed out in another post on this thread, say "BS or equivalent experience" or words to that effect; if you can show the "or equivalent", and can get past the first hurdle, then that title is the least of the issues. For example, if we advertised a job requiring "PhD or equivalent", and among the candidates were Bill Gates, Larry Page, and Sergey Brin, none of whom has obtained a PhD to the best of my knowledge, they would surely be able to display the "or equivalent" based on their accomplishments and experience, and thus get past that first hurdle.
[...]
-
TAG.google.evolution.talent.detection
..
-- http://lazaridis.com .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: - E04 - Leadership! Google, Guido van Rossum, PSF
- From: Steve Holden
- Re: - E04 - Leadership! Google, Guido van Rossum, PSF
- References:
- Re: - E04 - Leadership! Google, Guido van Rossum, PSF
- From: Alex Martelli
- Re: - E04 - Leadership! Google, Guido van Rossum, PSF
- From: Anton Vredegoor
- Re: - E04 - Leadership! Google, Guido van Rossum, PSF
- From: Alex Martelli
- Re: - E04 - Leadership! Google, Guido van Rossum, PSF
- Prev by Date: Re: Regex anomaly
- Next by Date: Re: itertools.izip brokeness
- Previous by thread: Re: - E04 - Leadership! Google, Guido van Rossum, PSF
- Next by thread: Re: - E04 - Leadership! Google, Guido van Rossum, PSF
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|