Re: Default/editable string to raw_input
- From: Sybren Stuvel <sybrenUSE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:38:52 +0100
Paraic Gallagher enlightened us with:
While I agree in principal to your opinion, the idea is that an
absolute moron would be able to configure a testcell with smallest
amount of effort possible.
Then explain to me why learning how to use your program to edit the
file is easier than using an already familiar program.
Moreover, I am curious as to whether somebody else out there knows
if there is a solution to the problem.
Give a default answer that's chosen when the user presses enter
without providing an answer of his own.
Sybren
--
The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be a
capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the
safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Default/editable string to raw_input
- From: Sion Arrowsmith
- Re: Default/editable string to raw_input
- References:
- Default/editable string to raw_input
- From: Paraic Gallagher
- Re: Default/editable string to raw_input
- From: Sybren Stuvel
- Re: Default/editable string to raw_input
- From: Paraic Gallagher
- Default/editable string to raw_input
- Prev by Date: Re: struct size confusion:
- Next by Date: string.upto() and string.from()
- Previous by thread: Re: Default/editable string to raw_input
- Next by thread: Re: Default/editable string to raw_input
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading