Re: Can we create an_object = object() and add attribute like fora class?
- From: aleaxit@xxxxxxxxx (Alex Martelli)
- Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 17:49:21 -0700
Pierre Rouleau <prouleau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
Pierre Rouleau wrote:
I can understand the design decision not to give object a __dict__, but
I wonder if i'd be a good idea to have a class that derives from object
and has a __dict__ to be in the standard library.
so you can replace one line of code in some of your programs with
an import statement ?
ok... I should have said "something like the built-in object type"
instead of "standard library"...
I'm -1 on adding a new built-in for this functionality -- it's just not
important enough to warrant a built-in (there are already too many
built-ins!).
Putting a "namespace type" in the standard library could provide enough
helpful functionality to make an import well warranted, so I'm +1 on
adding such a type to the standard library (in 2.6 -- I think it's too
late for 2.6).
Alex
.
- References:
- Can we create an_object = object() and add attribute like for a class?
- From: Pierre Rouleau
- Re: Can we create an_object = object() and add attribute like for a class?
- From: Alex Martelli
- Re: Can we create an_object = object() and add attribute like for a class?
- From: Pierre Rouleau
- Re: Can we create an_object = object() and add attribute like fora class?
- From: Fredrik Lundh
- Re: Can we create an_object = object() and add attribute like fora class?
- From: Pierre Rouleau
- Can we create an_object = object() and add attribute like for a class?
- Prev by Date: Re: best way to determine sequence ordering?
- Next by Date: Re: resume picking items from a previous list
- Previous by thread: Re: Can we create an_object = object() and add attribute like fora class?
- Next by thread: Why does bufsize=1 not work in subprocess.Popen ?
- Index(es):