Re: Can we create an_object = object() and add attribute like fora class?
- From: Pierre Rouleau <prouleau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 20:12:48 -0400
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
Pierre Rouleau wrote:
I can understand the design decision not to give object a __dict__, but
I wonder if i'd be a good idea to have a class that derives from object
and has a __dict__ to be in the standard library.
so you can replace one line of code in some of your programs with
an import statement ?
ok... I should have said "something like the built-in object type" instead of "standard library"...
--
Pierre Rouleau
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Can we create an_object = object() and add attribute like fora class?
- From: Alex Martelli
- Re: Can we create an_object = object() and add attribute like fora class?
- References:
- Can we create an_object = object() and add attribute like for a class?
- From: Pierre Rouleau
- Re: Can we create an_object = object() and add attribute like for a class?
- From: Alex Martelli
- Re: Can we create an_object = object() and add attribute like for a class?
- From: Pierre Rouleau
- Re: Can we create an_object = object() and add attribute like fora class?
- From: Fredrik Lundh
- Can we create an_object = object() and add attribute like for a class?
- Prev by Date: Re: best way to determine sequence ordering?
- Next by Date: Re: best way to determine sequence ordering?
- Previous by thread: Re: Can we create an_object = object() and add attribute like fora class?
- Next by thread: Re: Can we create an_object = object() and add attribute like fora class?
- Index(es):
