Re: error handling in user input: is this natural or just laborious
- From: "sam" <python.sam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 7 Oct 2006 11:17:13 -0700
a huge amount to think about there. special thanks to james for taking
the time to make such detailed responses. the problem is that even
though nested loops and the like place a heavy analytical burden on the
programmer (i.e. me) as he tries to remember what does what,
conceptualizing a program as a collection of classes and functions tied
together with a minimal amount of code brings to bear what is, at the
moment, an even greater burden.
my gut feeling is that, over time (as james said was true in his own
case), and with practice, the relative weights of these two burdens
change so that the procedural approach becomes easier to adopt, and its
benefits of readability and maintainability easier to enjoy. fingers
crossed...
i will continue coding the monte carlo machine until it does what i
want in more or less clumsy fashion, and might put it up here if it
feels like it would be of interest.
thanks again,
sam
.
- References:
- error handling in user input: is this natural or just laborious
- From: sam
- Re: error handling in user input: is this natural or just laborious
- From: bruno de chez modulix en face
- error handling in user input: is this natural or just laborious
- Prev by Date: Re: Dumping the state of a deadlocked process
- Next by Date: Re: curses problem reading cursor keys
- Previous by thread: Re: error handling in user input: is this natural or just laborious
- Next by thread: Re: error handling in user input: is this natural or just laborious
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|